At first blush, dropping from a 25% to 10% assessment would suggest a corresponding tax bill reduction of 60%; however, this would only occur if the assessment itself did not change. In actuality, the Assessor may also substantially increase the property’s assessed value, wiping out much of the savings. Our analysis of a hypothetical property before and after obtaining a 6B classification illustrates the extent to which the actual savings achieved could vary under various tax regimes. In our analysis, a property in a 7% tax rate community, might realize a tax savings of 49%, compared to 60%, with a change to a 6B classification; while a property in a high 25% tax rate community would realize a reduction of just 34%.
The analysis explores the mathematical implications of going from a 25% to 10% assessment through the application of tax loaded capitalization rates. The conundrum has always been that the act of lowering the assessment drops the operating costs of the property which, in turn increases the overall value of the property, partially offsetting the benefits of the lower assessment. For analytical purposes, we assume a hypothetical 10,000-square-foot building, with an NOI before real estate taxes of $100,000. We use a 2.8032 state equalizer and a market rate capitalization rate (before the tax load) of 9%.
6B W/No Value Change | 6B W/Value Change | ||||||
Tax | 25% | Overall | 10% | Overall | |||
Rate | Assessment | Taxes SF | % Reduction | Assessment | % Reduction | ||
7% | Value | $719,135 | $719,135 | Value | $912,222 | ||
Taxes SF | $3.53 | $1.41 | -60% | Taxes SF | $1.79 | -49% | |
10% | Value | $624,688 | $624,688 | Value | $847,228 | ||
Taxes SF | $4.38 | $1.75 | -60% | Taxes SF | $2.37 | -46% | |
13% | Value | $552,169 | $552,169 | Value | $790,879 | ||
Taxes SF | $5.03 | $2.01 | -60% | Taxes SF | $2.88 | -43% | |
16% | Value | $494,736 | $494,736 | Value | $741,558 | ||
Taxes SF | $5.55 | $2.22 | -60% | Taxes SF | $3.33 | -40% | |
20% | Value | $434,480 | $434,480 | Value | $684,631 | ||
Taxes SF | $6.09 | $2.44 | -60% | Taxes SF | $3.842 | -37% | |
25% | Value | $377,077 | $377,077 | Value | $624,688 | ||
Taxes SF | $6.61 | $2.64 | -60% | Taxes SF | $4.38 | -34% | |
Interestingly, on a percentage basis, the tax savings actually drop as the tax rate goes up. In the chart above you can see that with a 25% property tax rate and a 25% assessment an assessed value of $377,074 is calculated, equating to property taxes of $6.61 per square foot. Nevertheless, value jumps quite dramatically to $624,688 when a 10% assessment is used in a loaded capitalization rate calculation. The property taxes based on this value would be $4.38 per square-foot or a 34% savings.
Unfortunately, it appears we have an example where people in lower income areas (typically where the very high property tax rates are) benefit less, at least on a percentage of tax reduction, from a 10% incentive than in lower property tax areas such as Chicago.